<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan Wood Communications &#187; media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/tag/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Is the media a bigger threat than ‘flu?</title>
		<link>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/08/is-the-media-a-bigger-threat-than-%e2%80%98flu/</link>
		<comments>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/08/is-the-media-a-bigger-threat-than-%e2%80%98flu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our news media isn’t interested in evidence, it needs seeks out the new, the different and a good row.  But when it comes to matters of public health, scare-mongering for the sake of a good headline is not just irresponsible, it could be lethal.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/08/is-the-media-a-bigger-threat-than-%e2%80%98flu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limited sympathy for local papers hit by council freesheets</title>
		<link>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/08/limited-sympathy-for-local-papers-hit-by-council-freesheets/</link>
		<comments>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/08/limited-sympathy-for-local-papers-hit-by-council-freesheets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 11:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audit Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the growth of local authority free newspapers is undoubtedly hitting traditional local titles in some places, let's not pretend that all local papers are the cornerstone of local democracy.  We need to debate the future of local media council communications channels, rather than prop up outdated models of media production.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/08/limited-sympathy-for-local-papers-hit-by-council-freesheets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

