<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan Wood Communications &#187; Labour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/tag/labour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Twitter doesn’t end careers; bad judgement does</title>
		<link>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2010/04/twitter-doesn%e2%80%99t-end-careers-bad-judgement-does/</link>
		<comments>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2010/04/twitter-doesn%e2%80%99t-end-careers-bad-judgement-does/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuart MacLennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gosh! How exciting!  Twitter has claimed its first scalp in the internet election!  But it wasn't Twitter that got Stuart MacLennan sacked, it was his own poor judgement.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2010/04/twitter-doesn%e2%80%99t-end-careers-bad-judgement-does/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The wisdom of crowds</title>
		<link>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/10/the-wisdom-of-crowds-2/</link>
		<comments>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/10/the-wisdom-of-crowds-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[public affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lib Dem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians are queuing up at the party conferences to pledge which bits of the public sector they’ll axe in the race to cut government spending.  But the cuts that are likely to win the most votes aren’t necessarily going to be the ones that will bring the greatest savings.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/10/the-wisdom-of-crowds-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reports of the grid’s demise greatly exaggerated</title>
		<link>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/09/reports-of-the-grid%e2%80%99s-demise-greatly-exaggerated/</link>
		<comments>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/09/reports-of-the-grid%e2%80%99s-demise-greatly-exaggerated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been recent reports that Labour will be scrapping the news management ‘grid’ in the forthcoming election.   This seems unlikely with both main parties battling harder than ever to set the day’s news agenda.  So how can the grid approach, so successful in 1997, be updated to reflect a more 24 hour and online media landscape?
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/09/reports-of-the-grid%e2%80%99s-demise-greatly-exaggerated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

