<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan Wood Communications &#187; Cameron</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/tag/cameron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>The wisdom of crowds</title>
		<link>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/10/the-wisdom-of-crowds-2/</link>
		<comments>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/10/the-wisdom-of-crowds-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[public affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lib Dem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians are queuing up at the party conferences to pledge which bits of the public sector they’ll axe in the race to cut government spending.  But the cuts that are likely to win the most votes aren’t necessarily going to be the ones that will bring the greatest savings.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/10/the-wisdom-of-crowds-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the NHS Cameron’s Clause 4?</title>
		<link>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/08/is-the-nhs-cameron%e2%80%99s-clause-4/</link>
		<comments>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/08/is-the-nhs-cameron%e2%80%99s-clause-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Hannan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ipsos-MORI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As David Cameron tries to reassure the electorate that the NHS is safe in his hands, should he be worried that he seems to be finding his own party harder to win over than the public? Could it be the chance to prove that his is a truly ‘caring’ brand of conservatism?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://danwoodcomms.co.uk/2009/08/is-the-nhs-cameron%e2%80%99s-clause-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

